tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10721624.post7176454009257110384..comments2023-10-30T12:26:15.822+01:00Comments on Research as a Second Language: From Call to Abstract 2Thomashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04858865501469168339noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10721624.post-56163754103638053812010-10-06T19:07:37.387+02:002010-10-06T19:07:37.387+02:00Hej Kristian,
"it" is the paper and you...Hej Kristian,<br /><br />"it" is the paper and you're right that that should be fixed. I ran out of time when working on the post this morning.<br /><br />My intention (which is of course ultimately irrelevant) was to cover those last three categories with the reference (which is, after all, in the same sentence). But perhaps "guided by" is too vague and actually obscures more than it clarifies. I'll have to work on that on Friday. The idea will be able to say something more like "Like Spicer (2006), ..."Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04858865501469168339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10721624.post-14073613853689969902010-10-06T15:29:54.502+02:002010-10-06T15:29:54.502+02:00"Guided by Spicer's (2006) call to move t..."Guided by Spicer's (2006) call to move the discussion "beyond convergence-divergence", it construes the region as a "shared space" for organizations in which images of the past are transformed through capital accumulation, regulation and, especially, discourse."<br /><br />Hi Thomas<br /><br />A few comments to your abstract:<br /><br />What does IT refer to?<br /><br />And you cannot see that it is Spicer who suggest the analytical categories of capital accumulation, regulation and, discourse. Is that not bad referencing, eventhough it is in an abstract? <br /><br />KristianGyllingRoepstorffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08135168946401794882noreply@blogger.com